You do not need to register or log in to post a comment. Differing opinions welcome.
Personal Attacks are taken for what they are, acts of desperation or plain mean spiritedness.
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Doug Strehl -- 725-5293 (Source: phone book)
Ken Zanzi -- 726-7934 (Source: phone book)
Dean Glaser: 725-3880 (Source: phone book)
Mike Losey -- 725-2574-- PO Box 159, Fortuna -- Email: mlosey@suddenlink.net (Source: Losey4citycouncil.com)
Sue Long: 725-5641 (Source: Sue-Long-Fortuna-City-Council)
Mailing Address for all: c/o City Hall, 621 11th Street, Fortuna, CA 95540
email via City Website ---please note that there may be a delay as system requires City Clerk to forward messages
--The 5 million gallon Vancil reservoir has 4 million gallons of unused storage. It is up the street from the proposed tank. In Fortuna’s southeast there is an identified need for storage, but no proposed projects.
--The proposed 2 million gallon tank was sized only to meet current demand. With 4 million gallons of unused storage, Vancil will easily meet current and future growth needs in the north part of town.
--Built before the 1964 Christmas flood, Vancil was part of a water development program for a growing city with 5 wood products manufacturing plants. There is no evidence that it was ever intended as emergency storage.
--The City requested and was told there are no regulatory obstacles to using Vancil.
--The Water Bonds are not a legal obstacle to using Vancil, Fortuna is not required to build the proposed tank. The City Council can and has changed the 2006 bond funded projects
--We were told the water rate increase was to borrow money (sell bonds) that would fund "urgent projects" required to fulfill the City's "current operational responsibilities."
--A pipeline between Vancil and downtown will make 4 million gallons available, providing the 1 million gallons of fire reserve storage recommended for down town. The proposed tank has only 1/2 million gallons for fire reserve storage.
--Using Vancil will make bond funds available for other necessary projects, allowing us to avoid an unnecessary rate increase.
--We can safely and reliably use Vancil for 50 years and spend less than the cost of the proposed tank, plus interest.
--The 50-year estimate was based on the January 2009 Staff Report’s estimate of $10,000/year energy cost. Three months earlier, in September 2008, the City requested and received information that the actual cost would be half that, $5,000/year. Based on this, we could expect using Vancil would be significantly less than the proposed tank.
I still do not know the motivation for the tank, but I suspect and hope that this is a simple case of good intentions and faulty assumptions resulting in a misguided project.
Doug Strehl -- 725-5293 (Source: phone book)
Ken Zanzi -- 726-7934 (Source: phone book)
Dean Glaser: 725-3880 (Source: phone book)
Mike Losey -- 725-2574-- PO Box 159, Fortuna -- Email: mlosey@suddenlink.net (Source: Losey4citycouncil.com)
Sue Long: 725-5641 (Source: Sue-Long-Fortuna-City-Council)
Mailing Address for all: c/o City Hall, 621 11th Street, Fortuna, CA 95540
email via City Website ---please note that there may be a delay as system requires City Clerk to forward messages
Doug Strehl -- 725-5293 (Source: phone book)
Ken Zanzi -- 726-7934 (Source: phone book)
Dean Glaser: 725-3880 (Source: phone book)
Mike Losey -- 725-2574-- PO Box 159, Fortuna -- Email: mlosey@suddenlink.net (Source: Losey4citycouncil.com)
Sue Long: 725-5641 (Source: Sue-Long-Fortuna-City-Council)
Mailing Address for all: c/o City Hall, 621 11th Street, Fortuna, CA 95540
Why are you suing the city manager and attorney Janelle? You realize they are indemnified and that your specious claims, which will now be investigated by the city, by independent investigators, will cost us, the taxpayers thousands of dollars, right?
ReplyDeleteI hope you are prepared to reimburse the city when and if your claims are proven to be false.
You want sunshine for Fortuna, then OUT WITH IT - why don't you post the specifics of the supposed wrongdoings here, as opposed to your rambling nonsense at the last council meeting.
Ed V.
What I gave the Council was a complaint against the City Manager. He said the City had no records relating to the costs of a $4million dollar public works project.
ReplyDeleteNow, would you believe such a statement?
There were records showing that several hundred thousand dollars had been spent on developing the plans.
Couple years ago I did as the law provides, and filed a lawsuite. I really believed that would solve the problem. It didn't. So, this time I filed a complaint against the person responsible.
The specifics are in the April 18, 2011 Agenda Packet, starting at page 106, its on the City webpage. Mr. Tranberg has been given the supporting records I said I would provide. The City has a copy, go ask to to see them.
I haven't been doing much with this lately, so set up moderation of comments and forgot to check the box to have them forwarded to my email. My apologizes for taking so long to respond.
Please feel free to send me an email next time: fortuna.sunshine@yahoo.com
Ed, you might also be interested in these records:
ReplyDelete1--2011-01-28_009030.100-BidSchedule_fr SHN.PDF 2--2011-04-29 Copy_SHN_Invoice Tracking.xlsx
3--Finance Department 5-4-11 report for all accounts 510 **** 9124
4--Contract Change Order No. 2 for Holman Tank/Pressure Zones 3-5 Connection – Reservoir Phase (Stewart Tank) project
5-- CIP #0122, 2010-11 City Budget, p 77, and comments on this piping project in Public Works Monthly Report dated 11-15-10
6-- Garden Lane easement comments in Public Works Monthly Reports in 2-22-2011, 3-21-2011 and 4-18-2011 Agenda Packets
7-- CIP #0922, compare last year's project to this year's and check the 1-12-09 Staff Report, Appendix C for info on need for a 12” pipe