Fortuna Exchange: Editorial: Dissent takes beating in court - Sacramento Editorial

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Editorial: Dissent takes beating in court - Sacramento Editorial | Sacramento Bee

here's that article I mentioned.
Editorial: Dissent takes beating in court - Sacramento Bee
Posted using ShareThis

Get elected, loose your freedom of speech; odd bit of judicial reasoning. Californians Aware's website was one of the resources I used when I was trying to communicate with City staff about preliminary records and where I found my attorney, Paul Boylan, when they refused to respond.

I've been working on FortunaCitizen; adding links for printable/readable versions of the documents I photographed. And here, added a chunk to the discussion of Council meetings.

No comments:

Post a Comment

City Council contact information

New tank or use Vancil Reservoir?

--The 5 million gallon Vancil reservoir has 4 million gallons of unused storage. It is up the street from the proposed tank. In Fortuna’s southeast there is an identified need for storage, but no proposed projects.

--The proposed 2 million gallon tank was sized only to meet current demand. With 4 million gallons of unused storage, Vancil will easily meet current and future growth needs in the north part of town.

--Built before the 1964 Christmas flood, Vancil was part of a water development program for a growing city with 5 wood products manufacturing plants. There is no evidence that it was ever intended as emergency storage.

--The City requested and was told there are no regulatory obstacles to using Vancil.

--The Water Bonds are not a legal obstacle to using Vancil, Fortuna is not required to build the proposed tank. The City Council can and has changed the 2006 bond funded projects

--We were told the water rate increase was to borrow money (sell bonds) that would fund "urgent projects" required to fulfill the City's "current operational responsibilities."

--A pipeline between Vancil and downtown will make 4 million gallons available, providing the 1 million gallons of fire reserve storage recommended for down town. The proposed tank has only 1/2 million gallons for fire reserve storage.

--Using Vancil will make bond funds available for other necessary projects, allowing us to avoid an unnecessary rate increase.

--We can safely and reliably use Vancil for 50 years and spend less than the cost of the proposed tank, plus interest.

--The 50-year estimate was based on the January 2009 Staff Report’s estimate of $10,000/year energy cost. Three months earlier, in September 2008, the City requested and received information that the actual cost would be half that, $5,000/year. Based on this, we could expect using Vancil would be significantly less than the proposed tank.

I still do not know the motivation for the tank, but I suspect and hope that this is a simple case of good intentions and faulty assumptions resulting in a misguided project.

City Council contact information

Fortuna Exchange

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Editorial: Dissent takes beating in court - Sacramento Editorial | Sacramento Bee

No comments:

Post a Comment

Header photo credit

This is a companion site to

contact

Wish to add an issue for discussion?

Topics

City Council contact information

Estimated cost: $4,500,000

New tank or use Vancil Reservoir?

City Council contact information

City Council contact informantion